The Shroud of Turin is either a priceless artifact or the prophetic blueprint of the world's most sinister plot--according to prior prophecies. Seed of ancient Hebrews currently dwelling in Israel in the south offer conclusive evidence as to the features of ancient Hebrews. Professor Hillel's DNA analysis in "History of a Myth" and "The Golden Fleece Found" give scientific evidence as to the identities and racial makeup of most ancient Hebrews, including those earliest Judeo-Christian converts of Jeshua.
The volume listed below suggests that the portraying of a European-looking Jeshua is not only in contradiction to the Second Commandment (Exodus 20:4) but that the deed might be a very sinister and demonic plot--a foundation seed preview of the Antichrist. We must explore that possibility. After all: think of the many "elect" persons that could be fooled by believing that the Messiah resurrected and became born again as, not a Hebrew Messiah ("to the Jew first") but as a European to reject His own. That could easily happen if we believe that the ancient Hebrews looked like the recent Jewish returnees (those that returned from Russia, Europe, and America). Could that rejection and recasting be based on this scripture in the King James Bible? John 1:11 states "He came to his own and they received Him not." The New Living Translation (printed 2007) states "He came to his own people and his own received him not." My simple question is this. Is it written that because "Some" of his own rejected him that He rejected his own people? I say "some" because that teaching is unfounded: all his disciples and over 90-percent of his then followers were Jews, mainly black Jews.
We would have a different perception if we observed the black skin and black hair--quite different facial characteristics-- of those Jews, whose ancestors resided in Israel from the time of Christ (the black shepherds or Bedouin) that inhabit the Wildernesses of Judea and Massada. Paintings in museums in Israel, Oman and other Arabic nations reveal that ancient Jews, Arabs and Africans looked so much alike that they were indistinguishable--except for dress and jewelry. Artifacts and coins in Syria's most revered history book "From Elba to Damascus" highlight the early black Syrian population also. Coins of the legendary Queen Zenobia of Syria (240-274 C.E) show a black lady with thick lips and braids. The Book of Esther in the Torah and the Bible, state that under the reign of Ahaserus, Jews who lived in Israel, inhabitants of Ethiopia and residents of India had indistinguishable features. That became apparent during the selection of a replacement queen for Queen Vashti. As a result, Esther (a black Jewish girl) got the nod. All ancient artifacts, drawings, and Torah descriptions point to the fact that ancient Hebrews were mainly black or dark brown peoples- Amos 9:7, Song of Solomon 1:5, and 1:6, Leviticus 13:31, Lev 13:37.
Description of Ancient Hebrews:
Their hairs were black: Leviticus 13:31 and 13:37...2 Kings 1:8. Genesis 25:25 (Torah texts "black knitted hair like rolled oats"; Exodus 25:23, Exodus 25:26; Numbers 6:5 hair knitted in locks; Song 5:11 "Hair black like those of a blackbird." Black Skin---Job 30:30 "My skin was black"...Song of Solomon 1:5, and 1:6 Black in appearance; Job 30:30, Amos 9:7.
Let us be very clear: Jeshua's followers were not persecuted and fed to lions because they were Semitic or Hamitic Hebrews. The strange truth is that because most ancient Hebrews were black in appearance, and because Jews were blamed for burning the most holy pagan city, Rome, hatred for Jews became universal hatred for blacks because since early times, Jewish traders, tent makers, and Hebrew texts' copyists were all black. So for the first 300 years of the proliferation of Rome's version of Gentile Christianity, when Jews--mainly black Jews--were hunted and persecuted, Europe knew only black Jews. Jews and black people became synonymous. Over time Satan, the biggest hater of black Hebrews (their shrines and temples are spoken about worldwide: David, Samson, Solomon) got nations to steal their land, precious resources and work them without pay for 400-year periods in fulfillment of Psalm 44:12, Isaiah 52: 5, and Genesis 15:13. Jews even got blamed for killing Jesus.
WHOSE IMAGE IS ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN?
European-looking Jews were non-existent during the time of Jeshua called "Jesus the Christ." In fact, the only European-looking people that Jesus or His disciples ever saw were Romans, perhaps Greeks and inhabitants of Adriatic coastal regions. Saul (mistaken for an Egyptian) Simon Bar Jonah, and most of Jeshua's disciples were all black or brown ancient Hebrews. The man called Simon (father of at least one of Jeshua's disciples) chosen to carry Jeshua's cross hailed from the African coastal town of Cyrene, now Libya, was also black or brown. The fact that Jeshua's natural mother, stepfather, and he as an infant could have gone to Egypt and not be recognized meant that they all must have looked like the black and brown Egyptians.
The Shroud:
If the Shroud of Turin is what the caretakers say it is, it would "Not" be a priceless artifact because it is patched. Original and priceless artifacts need to be in their original forms-as natural as possible. The artifact would be extremely pricey, but not priceless. If it is a fake, it would still be very valuable--because of its mastery. Which is it?
Previous Tests:
In 1988, after years of trying to secure permission to test the shroud, using numerous carbon-dating techniques approved by the Vatican authorities, scientists made their findings public. The fibers that they extracted proved that either the shroud or parts of the shroud were of woven fabric from medieval times--somewhere around the middle 13th to late 14th century. Some were more specific. They gave a timeline of approx 1250 to 1400 C.E. None of the examiners compared the features on the shroud to those of the ancient Hebrews.
REAL LITMUST TEST MISSING
It is well documented that one of the things that took place in the Upper Room in Israel during the 40-day wait after Jeshua's Resurrection was that the Holy Spirit transferred God's kinetic energy upon all Jeshua's disciples. While Jeshua was on earth, and more so now that He has attained the affirmation of Psalm 2, that kinetic energy is even more real. I can speak with such authority because I experienced it firsthand in the same Upper Room in 1998, while I visited the ruins of the synagogue where Jeshua preached, and at the ruins of Simon bar Jonah's house. Scientists affirm the existence of kinetic energy. It is described as energy attached to an object in motion, equal to half the mass of the body times the square of its velocity.
Prophets and extremely holy people are known to manifest very strong amounts of kinetic energy. Since Jeshua's kinetic energy is so strong that anything He touched or touches holds God's spiritual energy ad infinitum, why not include the obvious fail-proof test? The Vatican's ultimate litmus test for anyone being named for sainthood in the Catholic Church is the miraculous healing of a formerly sick person who allegedly touches a relic or picture of a dead Christian martyr. Think of how much more miraculous power and kinetic energy there is, if that Shroud is really the burial cloth of the Resurrected Christ? By continuing to insist that the European-looking image is Jeshua, according to the same prophecy book referenced previously, if someone can clone a body representing that depicted on the Shroud, what could prevent Satan from entering it? All spirits need bodies or objects of motion to attach their kinetic energies to. Since the image closely resembles Michelangelo's nephew, who posed for a portrait depicting Jeshua, WHAT A CLEVER WAY TO "FOOL THE VERY ELECT."
Suggested readings: The Golden Fleece Found by Basil Hill http://www.amazon.com/Golden-Fleece-Found-Basil-Hill/dp/1412043190
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Basil_C._Hill
No comments:
Post a Comment