Sunday, May 9, 2010

Who Or What Are the Reptilians?

.....Reptilians that the Alternative Internet Media are so Obsessed With?

If you are a fan of the incredible phenomena that is now the 'Alternative' Internet Media or better the 'Alternative' Internet News Media you will need no introduction to this particular subject - none at all. In fact, many millions of people would now say that this 'alternative news' is the only news worthy of our attention, for the other stuff that spews daily from our TV screens is nothing more than propaganda pig's swill. If, on the other hand, you are not familiar with this "real news", and it's all very strange to you, may I suggest you carry out some basic research and come to your own conclusions, for I am not here to persuade you one way or the other? Having said that, when I first became aware of this reptilian topic, I, like millions of other people, baulked and considered the originator(s) of these mind boggling ideas somewhat whacky, to say the least, but at the same time, and, as always, reserving just that smidgeon of an open mind. Look folks, nothing is impossible until it is proven to be impossible. As an example, I am still not convinced that UFO's are the real deal, having never seen one for myself, but at the same time I keep an open mind on the whole matter. For example, if we read the opening chapters of the Book of Ezekiel with all his 'wings', 'eyes' and 'wheels' and with them moving back and forth, sideways and up and down, we have to admit that it's a total mystery, even surreal, unless attributed to some kind of highly advanced living machines or Godly Spiritual animal creations of some kind.

However, with this reptilian thing, I have good reason to believe that the whole idea is not as preposterous and outrageous as I, at first, thought. The main proponent of this theory is a fellow Englishman (not that that is of any significance in any way) who has written several books on this subject, but will remain nameless as I do not wish to create obstacles to the publishing of this article. OK, so who are we dealing with here, and what kind of a man would espouse a theory that certain people who walk on this earth, rubbing shoulders with us men and women on a day to day basis, are actually humanoid reptilian lizards posing as human beings? Some have said, and would still say, that he is one card short of a full deck, but would this be true? No, not at all in my opinion, for his talks and lectures are very well put together, lucid, informative and, most important of all, contain much Truth and are thereby very convincing.

Now does this arrangement sound familiar to you, especially those of you who have read my other articles? If not, it should, because this concept is no different to the scenario of the teaching of the Christian Religion and, even more so, the teaching of certain religious cults, who always deceive their adherents by using The Truth. Obviously they don't use all The Truth, for if they did they would then preach Grace Salvation in, and through, the Lord Jesus Christ and Him alone, but they don't, they always go astray with salvation by works religious nonsense with their long haired wimp non-Jesus and their man made puffed up intellectual reasoning.

The thing is, we are not dealing with a man of religion in this instance, and let's be clear, for he is not a Christian either. In fairness to him he does make this very plain in his public talks and lectures. Unfortunately, though, like so many others, he cannot see the wood for the trees due to the fact that he is not called of The Father to His Son. As it happens, he is very anti-religion, including the Christian Religion, and I have no problem with that, but at the same time he is critical of Christianity when in Truth he does not know what True Christianity is. This is an ignorance, and means that he has a blindness, for he cannot differentiate between Christianity (The Truth) and the Christian Religion (Lies) and this leaves his ideas and theories with a gaping hole - a chasm, a demonic chasm. At the same time let's also be clear that he is a spiritist man; a man of the spirit world, and is big on the esoteric with all his mystical utterings on 'energy' and 'the consciousness'. Some say he is just another New Age guru. He openly boasts about hearing voices and, in turn, these voices telling him to do certain things and to go to certain places. This is demonism however we cut it and the only voices he is hearing are those of the deceptive evil spirit world. Moreover, it behoves those of us who truly believe in an all powerful redeemer, the Lord Jesus Christ, who is soon to return to this earth in order to rule it with justice (righteousness), to sift what men like these say, and be not deceived by them, for make no mistake, the Devil is not divided.

So what does this man say and can anything he does say be verified by the Holy Scriptures, for this is where we should always go to see if it is so. If you have read my four articles entitled: "Did Eve Have With the Devil Or Did She Just Eat Some Fruit? - Parts 1 - 4" then you will already know that certain beings that walk this earth are descended, literally as well as spiritually, from the Devil through Cain to Naamah (Noah's wife) to Canaan (Cainaan). They are HIS SEED and the Holy Scriptures tell us so in no uncertain terms, even The Lord Himself:

John 8:38-45 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father. 39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham. 40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham. 41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God. 42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. 43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. 44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. 45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

Some of the first century Jewish leaders - the Pharisees and Scribes were not what they cracked themselves up to be. Notice what The Lord clearly states here: "I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father." Spiritually, their father was not the same father as The Lord Jesus Christ's Father!!!! Notice what The Lord follows this up with for they said: "Abraham is our father" and The Lord replies: "If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham. 40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham. 41 Ye do the deeds of your father." Dear people we must understand this earth shattering revelation from the first century. The Lord Jesus Christ was speaking on literal and physical terms here, not just Spiritual terms. These supposed Jews who were, in reality, Canaanite Jews, were not of Abraham's seed, for look what The Lord then says to them: "If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham." The Lord Jesus Christ was not talking to gentiles here, He is talking to people who openly boasted in being God's chosen people - Abraham's children, but The Lord clearly tells them they were not. He tells them they are just like THEIR FATHER - a liar and murderer from the beginning!! Notice, too, what The Lord says in order to confirm the literal physical side to this passage: "He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him." Who was the murderer!!?? Why, Cain was the murderer from the beginning and yet The Lord is citing the Devil as the first murderer. Could it be that Cain was just a physical representation of the Devil himself? I would suggest that was so and that Cain carried the Devil's spirit 24/7, making him 100% the Devil on earth, both physically and spiritually.

Look, too, at this statement: "We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God." Now why did they say this? Did The Lord mention fornication? No, not at all, He never said a word about fornication, so why did THEY bring it up? Easy, because they knew that He knew about their evil genetical origins. They knew that He knew that their mother Eve had fornicated with the Devil in the Garden and produced in her womb the demonic hybrid called Cain. We need to be aware, too, that this account is written in their book - The Talmud. This means that their own ancient writings give them away and reveal their sinful origins. All The Lord did was remind them of this fact by accusing them of being the Devil's own. This means that these so called Jewish leaders of the first century were, from the Godhead's perspective, not genetically descended from Abraham. Yes, they laid claim to this ancestry via Judah, but they had the wrong mother i.e. the daughter of Shuah - the Cainitess or Canaanitess. Please see my articles entitled: "Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob Jews? Genesis 38: Royal Judahites and the Canaanite Jews - Parts 1 & 2" for the full details. We should not be surprised by this for the same rule applies to the Arabs. They were descended from Abraham but not from Sarah, they were descended from Hagar, and it's the female line that is so crucial in these Patriarchal accounts, not the male line.

OK, so let's return to this issue of The Reptilians and see if we can add some Biblical substance to this man's whacky ideas, for I will tell you straight that if the Holy Scriptures do corroborate what this man is saying, then we really do have to sit up and take notice. Having taken notice we will then need to adjust our beliefs accordingly, for the genie will most assuredly be out of the lamp and without a hope of putting him back. So let's quote a Holy Scripture or three to start our search for The Truth:

Gen 3:1 (first half) Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made.

I will now copy the Greek Septuagint version of this same verse:

Gen 3:1 (first half) But the serpent was the most skilled of all the wild beasts, of the ones upon the earth whom the Lord had made.

I will now quote Revelation to assist us in our understanding of Genesis:

Rev 4:6-7 And before the throne there was a sea of glass like unto crystal: and in the midst of the throne, and round about the throne, were four beasts full of eyes before and behind. 7 And the first beast was like a lion, and the second beast like a calf, and the third beast had a face as a man, and the fourth beast was like a flying eagle.

Now what we have to understand about these Spiritual Beasts is that they are not beasts as we know them, and they are certainly not brute wild beasts, even though The Lord used these Spiritual Creatures as a type with which to copy when He came to create the physical versions of these same creatures. These Spiritual Beasts are very different and to compare them with the brute beasts of the field would be a calamitous error indeed. No, what we need to grasp here is this: Satan the Devil was as these heavenly living creatures - a spiritual beast not a physical beast. His spiritual image was that of a snake, a serpent or a reptile, but a spiritual snake and/or reptile with great intelligence and with a mastery of all the cunning crafts; a magician or sorcerer of the highest order; an enchanter. Notice what the Septuagint says: "The serpent was the most skilled of all the wild beasts." Most skilled at what? As I have already said, in witchcraft and in all the other skills that sorcerers have at their disposal. We also need to understand that this is how the Devil was created. The Godhead made him this way and he did not fall or go astray from being a good serpent - he was always evil from the day of his creation.

So if we now analyse a word or two from Strong's Concordance we will see:

H5175 nachash naw-khawsh from H5172; a snake (from its hiss): - serpent

H5172 nachash naw-khash a primitive root; properly to hiss, that is whisper a magic spell; generally to prognosticate: (foretell - i.e. fortune tellers) - divine, enchanter (hypnotist), use enchantment etc. (Brackets mine)

H6175 arum aw-room Passive particle of H6191; cunning (usually in a bad sense): crafty, prudent, subtil

H6191 A primitive root; properly to be (or make) bare; but used only in the derived sense (through the idea perhaps of smoothness) to be cunning.

From these two definitions we can easily see that they do not apply to wild snakes in a literal sense and yet at the same time the Devil is still a snake, a serpent and/or a reptile.

The question we now have to ask is this: In what physical form did he appear to Eve? As a serpent/reptile or disguised as a human being in order to enchant her more easily and thereby quickly seduce her? My wager would be on the latter scenario for I do not underestimate the power of the spirit realm of those times, for this was before the Godhead had curtailed their powers.

So to sum up, do I believe my fellow Englishman has got it right regarding reptilians in high places who now govern us? Yes I do and we now know that they are Cainites and Canaanites racially, but I would still be on my guard when listening to the spiritual dimension of this man's talks, for it is not a Godly Spiritual Dimension, so take care.

For more information on this subject please visit my web page.

Charles Crosby

Please visit my web page: http://yes2truth.com.istemp.com/index.html. Feel free to write if you wish to learn more: yes2grace@googlemail.com To e-mail, please add '@' in place of 'at' Thank you

"We can never be sure that the opinion we are endeavouring to stifle is a false opinion; and if we were sure, stifling it would be an evil still." John Stuart Mill - On Liberty, 1859.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Charles_Crosby

No comments: